Aeon AX-50 vs Beta Minicross R10 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Aeon AX-50stacks up against the Beta Minicross R10. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Aeon AX-50 | Beta Minicross R10 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 45 kg | 38 kg |
| Seat height | 21 mm | 24 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 0.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.75-10 / 2.75-10 | — |
Aeon AX-50 vs Beta Minicross R10 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Aeon AX-50 and the Beta Minicross R10 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Aeon AX-50 brings its published horsepower in a 45 kg package, while the Beta Minicross R10 counters with its own power figure at 38 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: