Aeon Revo 50 vs Kymco MXU 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Aeon Revo 50stacks up against the Kymco MXU 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Aeon Revo 50 | Kymco MXU 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 5 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | — |
| Weight | 115 kg | 100 kg |
| Seat height | 28 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 2.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 18/7-7 / 18/7-7 | 21/7-10 / 22/10-10 |
Aeon Revo 50 vs Kymco MXU 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Aeon Revo 50 and the Kymco MXU 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Aeon Revo 50 brings 4 hp in a 115 kg package, while the Kymco MXU 50 counters with 5 hp at 100 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: