AJS JSM 50 vs Kymco K-Pipe (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the AJS JSM 50stacks up against the Kymco K-Pipe. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | AJS JSM 50 | Kymco K-Pipe |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | 2 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 105 kg | — |
| Seat height | 32 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.3 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Double disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 110/70-17 / 130/70-17 | 120/70-17 / 130/70-17 |
AJS JSM 50 vs Kymco K-Pipe — which should you buy?
Picking between the AJS JSM 50 and the Kymco K-Pipe usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the AJS JSM 50 brings 5 hp in a 105 kg package, while the Kymco K-Pipe counters with 2 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: