Arctic Cat 300 vs Kymco MXU 300 R (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Arctic Cat 300stacks up against the Kymco MXU 300 R. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Arctic Cat 300 | Kymco MXU 300 R |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 270 cc | 271 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 19 hp |
| Weight | 216 kg | 241 kg |
| Seat height | 10 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.3 L | 3.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic. | Double disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic. | Single disc |
| Tires | 22/7-10 / 22/10-10 | 22/7-10 / 22/10-10 |
Arctic Cat 300 vs Kymco MXU 300 R — which should you buy?
Picking between the Arctic Cat 300 and the Kymco MXU 300 R usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Arctic Cat 300 brings its published horsepower in a 216 kg package, while the Kymco MXU 300 R counters with 19 hp at 241 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: