Arctic Cat 350 vs Kymco MXU 375i (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Arctic Cat 350stacks up against the Kymco MXU 375i. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Arctic Cat 350 | Kymco MXU 375i |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2013 |
| Price | — | $5,599 |
| Engine | 366 cc | 367 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 26 hp |
| Weight | 267 kg | 275 kg |
| Seat height | — | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 4.3 L | 4.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Double disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc |
| Tires | 24/8-12 / 24/10-12 | 24/8-12 / 24/10-12 |
Arctic Cat 350 vs Kymco MXU 375i — which should you buy?
Picking between the Arctic Cat 350 and the Kymco MXU 375i usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Arctic Cat 350 brings its published horsepower in a 267 kg package, while the Kymco MXU 375i counters with 26 hp at 275 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike:

