Arctic Cat 700 vs Kymco MXU 700i (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Arctic Cat 700stacks up against the Kymco MXU 700i. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Arctic Cat 700 | Kymco MXU 700i |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2014 | 2013 |
| Price | — | $8,599 |
| Engine | 695 cc | 695 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 45 hp |
| Torque | — | 40 Nm |
| Weight | 307 kg | 357 kg |
| Seat height | — | 35 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 5.7 L | 4.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic. | Double disc. Hydraulic. |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic. | Single disc. Hydraulic. |
| Tires | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 |
Arctic Cat 700 vs Kymco MXU 700i — which should you buy?
Picking between the Arctic Cat 700 and the Kymco MXU 700i usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Arctic Cat 700 brings its published horsepower in a 307 kg package, while the Kymco MXU 700i counters with 45 hp at 357 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: