Arctic Cat Mud Pro 650 vs Can-Am Outlander 650 (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Arctic Cat Mud Pro 650stacks up against the Can-Am Outlander 650. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Arctic Cat Mud Pro 650 | Can-Am Outlander 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2014 |
| Price | $8,799 | $8,799 |
| Engine | 641 cc | 650 cc |
| Weight | 331 kg | 329 kg |
| Seat height | — | 35 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 5.7 L | 5.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Double disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers. |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers. |
| Tires | 28/9-14 / 28/9-14 | 26/8-12 / 26/10-12 |
Arctic Cat Mud Pro 650 vs Can-Am Outlander 650 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Arctic Cat Mud Pro 650 and the Can-Am Outlander 650 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Arctic Cat Mud Pro 650 brings its published horsepower in a 331 kg package, while the Can-Am Outlander 650 counters with its own power figure at 329 kg. On price, the Can-Am Outlander 650 has the lower MSRP.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: