Arctic Cat MudPro 650 H1 vs Can-Am Outlander 650 (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Arctic Cat MudPro 650 H1stacks up against the Can-Am Outlander 650. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Arctic Cat MudPro 650 H1 | Can-Am Outlander 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2014 |
| Price | $8,599 | $8,799 |
| Engine | 641 cc | 650 cc |
| Weight | 329 kg | 329 kg |
| Seat height | — | 35 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 5.7 L | 5.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Double disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers. |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers. |
| Tires | 28/9-14 / 28/9-14 | 26/8-12 / 26/10-12 |
Arctic Cat MudPro 650 H1 vs Can-Am Outlander 650 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Arctic Cat MudPro 650 H1 and the Can-Am Outlander 650 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Arctic Cat MudPro 650 H1 brings its published horsepower in a 329 kg package, while the Can-Am Outlander 650 counters with its own power figure at 329 kg. On price, the Arctic Cat MudPro 650 H1 has the lower MSRP.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: