Arctic Cat TRV 400 H1 vs Kymco MXU 400 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Arctic Cat TRV 400 H1stacks up against the Kymco MXU 400. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Arctic Cat TRV 400 H1 | Kymco MXU 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | $7,299 | — |
| Engine | 366 cc | 367 cc |
| Weight | 316 kg | 306 kg |
| Seat height | — | 33 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 5.3 L | 4.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc |
| Tires | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 |
Arctic Cat TRV 400 H1 vs Kymco MXU 400 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Arctic Cat TRV 400 H1 and the Kymco MXU 400 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Arctic Cat TRV 400 H1 brings its published horsepower in a 316 kg package, while the Kymco MXU 400 counters with its own power figure at 306 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: