Azel Sweet 50 vs Keeway Hacker 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Azel Sweet 50stacks up against the Keeway Hacker 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Azel Sweet 50 | Keeway Hacker 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | — |
| Torque | 3 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 96 kg | 115 kg |
| Fuel capacity | — | 2.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.50-17 / 2.75-17 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Azel Sweet 50 vs Keeway Hacker 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Azel Sweet 50 and the Keeway Hacker 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Azel Sweet 50 brings 4 hp in a 96 kg package, while the Keeway Hacker 50 counters with its own power figure at 115 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: