Azel Sweet 50 vs Kymco Agility RS (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Azel Sweet 50stacks up against the Kymco Agility RS. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Azel Sweet 50 | Kymco Agility RS |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | — |
| Torque | 3 Nm | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 96 kg | — |
| Seat height | — | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 0.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.50-17 / 2.75-17 | 2.50-17 / 2.75-17 |
Azel Sweet 50 vs Kymco Agility RS — which should you buy?
Picking between the Azel Sweet 50 and the Kymco Agility RS usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Azel Sweet 50 brings 4 hp in a 96 kg package, while the Kymco Agility RS counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike:

