Azel Sweet 50 vs Kymco Like 50 4T (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Azel Sweet 50stacks up against the Kymco Like 50 4T. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Azel Sweet 50 | Kymco Like 50 4T |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 96 kg | 101 kg |
| Seat height | — | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.50-17 / 2.75-17 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Azel Sweet 50 vs Kymco Like 50 4T — which should you buy?
Picking between the Azel Sweet 50 and the Kymco Like 50 4T usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Azel Sweet 50 brings 4 hp in a 96 kg package, while the Kymco Like 50 4T counters with 4 hp at 101 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: