BamX BX500-U4 Tahoe vs Honda FourTrax Foreman 4x4 ES EPS (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the BamX BX500-U4 Tahoestacks up against the Honda FourTrax Foreman 4x4 ES EPS. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | BamX BX500-U4 Tahoe | Honda FourTrax Foreman 4x4 ES EPS |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2017 |
| Price | $5,299 | $8,099 |
| Engine | 471 cc | 475 cc |
| Horsepower | 16 hp | — |
| Torque | 35 Nm | — |
| Weight | 310 kg | 286 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 4.5 L | 3.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Double disc | Double disc. Hydraulic |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake). Sealed drum |
| Tires | 23/8-12 / 23/10-12 | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 |
BamX BX500-U4 Tahoe vs Honda FourTrax Foreman 4x4 ES EPS — which should you buy?
Picking between the BamX BX500-U4 Tahoe and the Honda FourTrax Foreman 4x4 ES EPS usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the BamX BX500-U4 Tahoe brings 16 hp in a 310 kg package, while the Honda FourTrax Foreman 4x4 ES EPS counters with its own power figure at 286 kg. On price, the BamX BX500-U4 Tahoe has the lower MSRP.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: