Barossa KHB 250 vs Mikilon A6-250SCN (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Barossa KHB 250stacks up against the Mikilon A6-250SCN. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Barossa KHB 250 | Mikilon A6-250SCN |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 249 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 13 hp |
| Weight | 199 kg | — |
| Seat height | — | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 21/7-10 / 21/10-8 | 21/7-10 / 20/10-10 |
Barossa KHB 250 vs Mikilon A6-250SCN — which should you buy?
Picking between the Barossa KHB 250 and the Mikilon A6-250SCN usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Barossa KHB 250 brings its published horsepower in a 199 kg package, while the Mikilon A6-250SCN counters with 13 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: