Barossa MAM 170 vs Aeon Cobra RS 180 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Barossa MAM 170stacks up against the Aeon Cobra RS 180. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Barossa MAM 170 | Aeon Cobra RS 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 165 cc | 169 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 9 hp |
| Torque | — | 10 Nm |
| Weight | 170 kg | 165 kg |
| Seat height | — | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 2.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 21/7-10 / 21/10-8 | 21/7-10 / 21/10-8 |
Barossa MAM 170 vs Aeon Cobra RS 180 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Barossa MAM 170 and the Aeon Cobra RS 180 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Barossa MAM 170 brings its published horsepower in a 170 kg package, while the Aeon Cobra RS 180 counters with 9 hp at 165 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: