Barossa Mini AK3 vs Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Barossa Mini AK3stacks up against the Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Barossa Mini AK3 | Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 58 kg | 74 kg |
| Seat height | — | 22 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 0.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake). No front brake. | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 45/70-6 / 45/70-6 | 145/70-6 / 145/70-6 |
Barossa Mini AK3 vs Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Barossa Mini AK3 and the Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Barossa Mini AK3 brings its published horsepower in a 58 kg package, while the Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 counters with its own power figure at 74 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: