Barossa Mini AK3 vs Macbor ATV CX 100 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Barossa Mini AK3stacks up against the Macbor ATV CX 100. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Barossa Mini AK3 | Macbor ATV CX 100 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 58 kg | — |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | — | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake). No front brake. | Expanding brake (drum brake). Optional disk |
| Tires | 45/70-6 / 45/70-6 | — |
Barossa Mini AK3 vs Macbor ATV CX 100 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Barossa Mini AK3 and the Macbor ATV CX 100 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Barossa Mini AK3 brings its published horsepower in a 58 kg package, while the Macbor ATV CX 100 counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: