Beta ARK LC Skull vs Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta ARK LC Skullstacks up against the Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta ARK LC Skull | Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 5 hp |
| Torque | — | 5 Nm |
| Weight | 88 kg | — |
| Seat height | — | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.0 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic with Ø 220 mm stainless steel disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic with Ø 175 mm stainless steel disc |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 | 120/70-14 / 140/60-13 |
Beta ARK LC Skull vs Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta ARK LC Skull and the Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta ARK LC Skull brings its published horsepower in a 88 kg package, while the Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli counters with 5 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: