Beta Evo 250 4T vs Xispa R250 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta Evo 250 4Tstacks up against the Xispa R250. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta Evo 250 4T | Xispa R250 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 250 cc | 250 cc |
| Weight | 72 kg | 68 kg |
| Seat height | 27 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 0.7 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. 4 piston caliper | Single disc. AJP |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. 2 piston caliper | Single disc. AJP |
| Tires | 2.75-21 / 4.00-18 | — |
Beta Evo 250 4T vs Xispa R250 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta Evo 250 4T and the Xispa R250 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta Evo 250 4T brings its published horsepower in a 72 kg package, while the Xispa R250 counters with its own power figure at 68 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: