Beta Minicross R10 vs Clipic Bull 50 Junior (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta Minicross R10stacks up against the Clipic Bull 50 Junior. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta Minicross R10 | Clipic Bull 50 Junior |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 38 kg | 40 kg |
| Seat height | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.5 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | — | 2.50-10 / 2.50-10 |
Beta Minicross R10 vs Clipic Bull 50 Junior — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta Minicross R10 and the Clipic Bull 50 Junior usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta Minicross R10 brings its published horsepower in a 38 kg package, while the Clipic Bull 50 Junior counters with its own power figure at 40 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: