Beta Minicross R10 vs KTM 50 Mini Adventure (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta Minicross R10stacks up against the KTM 50 Mini Adventure. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta Minicross R10 | KTM 50 Mini Adventure |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 38 kg | 38 kg |
| Seat height | 24 mm | 21 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.5 L | 0.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
Beta Minicross R10 vs KTM 50 Mini Adventure — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta Minicross R10 and the KTM 50 Mini Adventure usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta Minicross R10 brings its published horsepower in a 38 kg package, while the KTM 50 Mini Adventure counters with its own power figure at 38 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: