Beta Minicross R10 vs Aeon AX-50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta Minicross R10stacks up against the Aeon AX-50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta Minicross R10 | Aeon AX-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 38 kg | 45 kg |
| Seat height | 24 mm | 21 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.5 L | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | — | 2.75-10 / 2.75-10 |
Beta Minicross R10 vs Aeon AX-50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta Minicross R10 and the Aeon AX-50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta Minicross R10 brings its published horsepower in a 38 kg package, while the Aeon AX-50 counters with its own power figure at 45 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: