Beta RR 4T 250 vs Beta RR 250M (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta RR 4T 250stacks up against the Beta RR 250M. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta RR 4T 250 | Beta RR 250M |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 250 cc | 250 cc |
| Weight | 117 kg | 117 kg |
| Seat height | 37 mm | 37 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.3 L | 2.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. double-piston floating caliper | Single disc. Floating disc ø255 mm and double-piston floating caliper |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. single-piston floating caliper | Single disc. Disc ø240 mm and single-piston floating caliper |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 |
Beta RR 4T 250 vs Beta RR 250M — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta RR 4T 250 and the Beta RR 250M usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta RR 4T 250 brings its published horsepower in a 117 kg package, while the Beta RR 250M counters with its own power figure at 117 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike:

