Beta RR 50 Eduro ALU vs Keeway Ranger (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta RR 50 Eduro ALUstacks up against the Keeway Ranger. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta RR 50 Eduro ALU | Keeway Ranger |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Torque | — | 2 Nm |
| Weight | 85 kg | — |
| Seat height | 37 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | 0.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | — |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | — |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 110/80-18 | — |
Beta RR 50 Eduro ALU vs Keeway Ranger — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta RR 50 Eduro ALU and the Keeway Ranger usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta RR 50 Eduro ALU brings its published horsepower in a 85 kg package, while the Keeway Ranger counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: