Beta RR 50 Eduro ALU vs Lem CX3 SR (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta RR 50 Eduro ALUstacks up against the Lem CX3 SR. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta RR 50 Eduro ALU | Lem CX3 SR |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 7 hp |
| Weight | 85 kg | 50 kg |
| Seat height | 37 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | 0.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 1-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Double disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 110/80-18 | — |
Beta RR 50 Eduro ALU vs Lem CX3 SR — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta RR 50 Eduro ALU and the Lem CX3 SR usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta RR 50 Eduro ALU brings its published horsepower in a 85 kg package, while the Lem CX3 SR counters with 7 hp at 50 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: