Beta RR 50 Enduro vs Ural Ranger (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta RR 50 Endurostacks up against the Ural Ranger. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta RR 50 Enduro | Ural Ranger |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Torque | — | 2 Nm |
| Weight | 85 kg | — |
| Seat height | 36 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 0.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | — |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | — |
| Tires | 80/90-21 / 110/80-18 | — |
Beta RR 50 Enduro vs Ural Ranger — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta RR 50 Enduro and the Ural Ranger usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta RR 50 Enduro brings its published horsepower in a 85 kg package, while the Ural Ranger counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: