Beta RR 50 Motard Track vs CH Racing WSM 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta RR 50 Motard Trackstacks up against the CH Racing WSM 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta RR 50 Motard Track | CH Racing WSM 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Weight | 85 kg | 92 kg |
| Seat height | 36 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 2.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 110/80-17 / 130/70-17 | 100/80-17 / 130/70-17 |
Beta RR 50 Motard Track vs CH Racing WSM 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta RR 50 Motard Track and the CH Racing WSM 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta RR 50 Motard Track brings its published horsepower in a 85 kg package, while the CH Racing WSM 50 counters with its own power figure at 92 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: