Beta RR Enduro 50 vs Xispa EnduCross 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta RR Enduro 50stacks up against the Xispa EnduCross 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta RR Enduro 50 | Xispa EnduCross 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 5 hp |
| Weight | 85 kg | — |
| Seat height | 36 mm | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 1-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 80/90-21 / 110/80-18 | — |
Beta RR Enduro 50 vs Xispa EnduCross 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta RR Enduro 50 and the Xispa EnduCross 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta RR Enduro 50 brings its published horsepower in a 85 kg package, while the Xispa EnduCross 50 counters with 5 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: