Beta RR Motard 50 vs Husqvarna SM 50 S (2004)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Beta RR Motard 50stacks up against the Husqvarna SM 50 S. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Beta RR Motard 50 | Husqvarna SM 50 S |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2004 | 2003 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Weight | 85 kg | 92 kg |
| Seat height | 36 mm | 35 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 3.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | — |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | — |
| Tires | 110/80-17 / 130/70-17 | — |
Beta RR Motard 50 vs Husqvarna SM 50 S — which should you buy?
Picking between the Beta RR Motard 50 and the Husqvarna SM 50 S usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Beta RR Motard 50 brings its published horsepower in a 85 kg package, while the Husqvarna SM 50 S counters with its own power figure at 92 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike:

