BMW R65 (reduced effect) vs CR&S VUN (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the BMW R65 (reduced effect)stacks up against the CR&S VUN. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | BMW R65 (reduced effect) | CR&S VUN |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1985 | 2017 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 649 cc | 652 cc |
| Horsepower | 27 hp | 54 hp |
| Torque | — | 59 Nm |
| Weight | — | 135 kg |
| Seat height | — | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 5.8 L | 3.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Four opposing pistons radial caliper with 4 pads |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake | Single disc. floating caliper |
| Tires | 90/90-18 / 120/90-18 | 120/70-ZR17 / 160/60-ZR17 |
BMW R65 (reduced effect) vs CR&S VUN — which should you buy?
Picking between the BMW R65 (reduced effect) and the CR&S VUN usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the BMW R65 (reduced effect) brings 27 hp, while the CR&S VUN counters with 54 hp at 135 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: