BMW R65 (reduced effect) vs Sachs Roadster V 1.6 (2000)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the BMW R65 (reduced effect)stacks up against the Sachs Roadster V 1.6. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | BMW R65 (reduced effect) | Sachs Roadster V 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1985 | 2000 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 649 cc | 650 cc |
| Horsepower | 27 hp | 50 hp |
| Weight | — | 169 kg |
| Seat height | — | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 5.8 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake | Single disc |
| Tires | 90/90-18 / 120/90-18 | — |
BMW R65 (reduced effect) vs Sachs Roadster V 1.6 — which should you buy?
Picking between the BMW R65 (reduced effect) and the Sachs Roadster V 1.6 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the BMW R65 (reduced effect) brings 27 hp, while the Sachs Roadster V 1.6 counters with 50 hp at 169 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: