Boom Trikes Muscle Low Rider vs Cheetah Ecotec (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Boom Trikes Muscle Low Riderstacks up against the Cheetah Ecotec. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Boom Trikes Muscle Low Rider | Cheetah Ecotec |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2013 |
| Price | — | $29,000 |
| Engine | 1596 cc | 1600 cc |
| Horsepower | 100 hp | 175 hp |
| Torque | 146 Nm | — |
| Weight | 700 kg | — |
| Seat height | — | 22 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 10.0 L | 2.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 170/60-17 / 295/50-15 | — |
Boom Trikes Muscle Low Rider vs Cheetah Ecotec — which should you buy?
Picking between the Boom Trikes Muscle Low Rider and the Cheetah Ecotec usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Boom Trikes Muscle Low Rider brings 100 hp in a 700 kg package, while the Cheetah Ecotec counters with 175 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: