Cagiva 600 W 16 vs KTM 620 LSE (1998)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Cagiva 600 W 16stacks up against the KTM 620 LSE. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Cagiva 600 W 16 | KTM 620 LSE |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1996 | 1998 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 601 cc | 609 cc |
| Horsepower | 34 hp | 50 hp |
| Torque | 50 Nm | — |
| Weight | 155 kg | 140 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
Cagiva 600 W 16 vs KTM 620 LSE — which should you buy?
Picking between the Cagiva 600 W 16 and the KTM 620 LSE usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Cagiva 600 W 16 brings 34 hp in a 155 kg package, while the KTM 620 LSE counters with 50 hp at 140 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: