Cagiva Mito SP525 vs Puma CityFly 125 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Cagiva Mito SP525stacks up against the Puma CityFly 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Cagiva Mito SP525 | Puma CityFly 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 12 hp | 11 hp |
| Torque | 11 Nm | — |
| Weight | 129 kg | 78 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.7 L | 0.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Double disc. 4-piston | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. 2-piston | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 110/70-ZR17 / 150/60-ZR17 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Cagiva Mito SP525 vs Puma CityFly 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Cagiva Mito SP525 and the Puma CityFly 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Cagiva Mito SP525 brings 12 hp in a 129 kg package, while the Puma CityFly 125 counters with 11 hp at 78 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: