Can-Am Outlander 650 X MR vs Puma Leopard 664 UTE (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Can-Am Outlander 650 X MRstacks up against the Puma Leopard 664 UTE. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Can-Am Outlander 650 X MR | Puma Leopard 664 UTE |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2014 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 650 cc | 650 cc |
| Weight | — | 350 kg |
| Seat height | 35 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 5.4 L | 4.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Double disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers. | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers. | Single disc |
| Tires | 28/8-12 / 28/10-2 | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 |
Can-Am Outlander 650 X MR vs Puma Leopard 664 UTE — which should you buy?
Picking between the Can-Am Outlander 650 X MR and the Puma Leopard 664 UTE usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Can-Am Outlander 650 X MR brings its published horsepower, while the Puma Leopard 664 UTE counters with its own power figure at 350 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: