CCM 604 R vs Husqvarna TE630 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the CCM 604 Rstacks up against the Husqvarna TE630. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | CCM 604 R | Husqvarna TE630 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2000 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 597 cc | 600 cc |
| Weight | 138 kg | 149 kg |
| Seat height | 33 mm | 37 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 5.3 L | 3.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 |
CCM 604 R vs Husqvarna TE630 — which should you buy?
Picking between the CCM 604 R and the Husqvarna TE630 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the CCM 604 R brings its published horsepower in a 138 kg package, while the Husqvarna TE630 counters with its own power figure at 149 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: