CCM X-TR250 vs Honda NX 250 (reduced effect) (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the CCM X-TR250stacks up against the Honda NX 250 (reduced effect). Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | CCM X-TR250 | Honda NX 250 (reduced effect) |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 1992 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 249 cc |
| Horsepower | 24 hp | 17 hp |
| Weight | 113 kg | — |
| Seat height | 36 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.3 L | 2.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Expanding brake |
| Tires | — | 100/90-19 / 120/90-16 |
CCM X-TR250 vs Honda NX 250 (reduced effect) — which should you buy?
Picking between the CCM X-TR250 and the Honda NX 250 (reduced effect) usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the CCM X-TR250 brings 24 hp in a 113 kg package, while the Honda NX 250 (reduced effect) counters with 17 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: