CCM XTR-4 300 vs Beta M4 4T (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the CCM XTR-4 300stacks up against the Beta M4 4T. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | CCM XTR-4 300 | Beta M4 4T |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 300 cc | 349 cc |
| Weight | 124 kg | 133 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.4 L | 2.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc |
| Tires | 2.50-21 / 3.00-18 | 120/70-17 / 150/60-17 |
CCM XTR-4 300 vs Beta M4 4T — which should you buy?
Picking between the CCM XTR-4 300 and the Beta M4 4T usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the CCM XTR-4 300 brings its published horsepower in a 124 kg package, while the Beta M4 4T counters with its own power figure at 133 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: