CF Moto 650NK ABS vs BMW R65 (reduced effect) (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the CF Moto 650NK ABSstacks up against the BMW R65 (reduced effect). Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | CF Moto 650NK ABS | BMW R65 (reduced effect) |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 1985 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 649 cc | 649 cc |
| Horsepower | 60 hp | 27 hp |
| Torque | 56 Nm | — |
| Seat height | 31 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 4.5 L | 5.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Double disc. ABS | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. ABS | Expanding brake |
| Tires | 120/70-ZR17 / 160/60-ZR17 | 90/90-18 / 120/90-18 |
CF Moto 650NK ABS vs BMW R65 (reduced effect) — which should you buy?
Picking between the CF Moto 650NK ABS and the BMW R65 (reduced effect) usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the CF Moto 650NK ABS brings 60 hp, while the BMW R65 (reduced effect) counters with 27 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: