CF Moto 650TK vs Ural M 67-6 (reduced effect) (2015)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the CF Moto 650TKstacks up against the Ural M 67-6 (reduced effect). Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | CF Moto 650TK | Ural M 67-6 (reduced effect) |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2015 | 1992 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 649 cc | 650 cc |
| Horsepower | 60 hp | 27 hp |
| Torque | 56 Nm | — |
| Seat height | 31 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 4.6 L | 4.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Double disc | Expanding brake |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake |
| Tires | 120/70-R17 / 160/60-R17 | 4.00-18 / 4.00-18 |
CF Moto 650TK vs Ural M 67-6 (reduced effect) — which should you buy?
Picking between the CF Moto 650TK and the Ural M 67-6 (reduced effect) usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the CF Moto 650TK brings 60 hp, while the Ural M 67-6 (reduced effect) counters with 27 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: