CF Moto 650TR-G vs Ural M 67 (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the CF Moto 650TR-Gstacks up against the Ural M 67. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | CF Moto 650TR-G | Ural M 67 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 1993 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 649 cc | 649 cc |
| Horsepower | 70 hp | 36 hp |
| Torque | 62 Nm | 43 Nm |
| Weight | — | 225 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 5.8 L | 5.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Double disc. ABS | Expanding brake |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. ABS | Expanding brake |
| Tires | 120/70-ZR17 / 180/55-ZR17 | — |
CF Moto 650TR-G vs Ural M 67 — which should you buy?
Picking between the CF Moto 650TR-G and the Ural M 67 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the CF Moto 650TR-G brings 70 hp, while the Ural M 67 counters with 36 hp at 225 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: