CH Racing WSM 50 Replica vs Beta RR 50 Motard Track (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the CH Racing WSM 50 Replicastacks up against the Beta RR 50 Motard Track. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | CH Racing WSM 50 Replica | Beta RR 50 Motard Track |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Weight | 92 kg | 85 kg |
| Seat height | 35 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 100/80-17 / 130/70-17 | 110/80-17 / 130/70-17 |
CH Racing WSM 50 Replica vs Beta RR 50 Motard Track — which should you buy?
Picking between the CH Racing WSM 50 Replica and the Beta RR 50 Motard Track usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the CH Racing WSM 50 Replica brings its published horsepower in a 92 kg package, while the Beta RR 50 Motard Track counters with its own power figure at 85 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: