Clipic Bull 50cc Junior vs Beta Minicross R10 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Clipic Bull 50cc Juniorstacks up against the Beta Minicross R10. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Clipic Bull 50cc Junior | Beta Minicross R10 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 40 kg | 38 kg |
| Seat height | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 0.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.50-10 / 2.50-10 | — |
Clipic Bull 50cc Junior vs Beta Minicross R10 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Clipic Bull 50cc Junior and the Beta Minicross R10 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Clipic Bull 50cc Junior brings its published horsepower in a 40 kg package, while the Beta Minicross R10 counters with its own power figure at 38 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: