Clipic Frog 125 vs UM Max 125 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Clipic Frog 125stacks up against the UM Max 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Clipic Frog 125 | UM Max 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Weight | 94 kg | — |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 26 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.1 L | 3.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 2.50-21 / 2.75-17 | — |
Clipic Frog 125 vs UM Max 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Clipic Frog 125 and the UM Max 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Clipic Frog 125 brings its published horsepower in a 94 kg package, while the UM Max 125 counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: