Clipic QT9 49 vs MBK Flipper (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Clipic QT9 49stacks up against the MBK Flipper. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Clipic QT9 49 | MBK Flipper |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 85 kg | 267 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 70/90-M16 / 80/90-M16 |
Clipic QT9 49 vs MBK Flipper — which should you buy?
Picking between the Clipic QT9 49 and the MBK Flipper usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Clipic QT9 49 brings its published horsepower in a 85 kg package, while the MBK Flipper counters with 3 hp at 267 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: