Clipic QT9 49 vs Yamaha Neos 4S (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Clipic QT9 49stacks up against the Yamaha Neos 4S. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Clipic QT9 49 | Yamaha Neos 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 85 kg | — |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 1.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Clipic QT9 49 vs Yamaha Neos 4S — which should you buy?
Picking between the Clipic QT9 49 and the Yamaha Neos 4S usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Clipic QT9 49 brings its published horsepower in a 85 kg package, while the Yamaha Neos 4S counters with 3 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: