Clipic QT9 vs Hyosung SB50 Super Cab (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Clipic QT9stacks up against the Hyosung SB50 Super Cab. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Clipic QT9 | Hyosung SB50 Super Cab |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | $1,290 | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 85 kg | 70 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/90-10 / 130/90-10 |
Clipic QT9 vs Hyosung SB50 Super Cab — which should you buy?
Picking between the Clipic QT9 and the Hyosung SB50 Super Cab usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Clipic QT9 brings its published horsepower in a 85 kg package, while the Hyosung SB50 Super Cab counters with its own power figure at 70 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: