Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 vs BamX BX50-S Side Kick (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50stacks up against the BamX BX50-S Side Kick. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 | BamX BX50-S Side Kick |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2010 |
| Price | — | $1,099 |
| Engine | 49 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 2 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 74 kg | 80 kg |
| Seat height | 22 mm | 24 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.6 L | 0.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | — | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 145/70-6 / 145/70-6 | 145/70-8 / 145/70-8 |
Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 vs BamX BX50-S Side Kick — which should you buy?
Picking between the Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 and the BamX BX50-S Side Kick usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 brings its published horsepower in a 74 kg package, while the BamX BX50-S Side Kick counters with 2 hp at 80 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: