Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 vs Barossa Mini AK3 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50stacks up against the Barossa Mini AK3. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 | Barossa Mini AK3 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 74 kg | 58 kg |
| Seat height | 22 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 0.6 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake). No front brake. |
| Tires | 145/70-6 / 145/70-6 | 45/70-6 / 45/70-6 |
Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 vs Barossa Mini AK3 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 and the Barossa Mini AK3 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 brings its published horsepower in a 74 kg package, while the Barossa Mini AK3 counters with its own power figure at 58 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: