Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 vs Macbor ATV CX 100 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50stacks up against the Macbor ATV CX 100. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 | Macbor ATV CX 100 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 74 kg | — |
| Seat height | 22 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 0.6 L | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | — | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake). Optional disk |
| Tires | 145/70-6 / 145/70-6 | — |
Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 vs Macbor ATV CX 100 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 and the Macbor ATV CX 100 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 brings its published horsepower in a 74 kg package, while the Macbor ATV CX 100 counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: